Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Justin TerVeer v. Cuevas Plus the People et al
as 2:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Taylor v. D. Cueva
as 2:2023cv10408
Petitioner:
Arthur Taylor
Respondent:
D. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Mester v. Dan Cueva
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Morris Mester
Respondent:
Dan Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv07287
Petitioner:
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Cramer v. Warden Jenkins et al
as 2:2023cv04659
Plaintiff:
David Cramer and David Anthony Cramer
Defendant:
Warden Jenkins, Captain Sieja, Lieutenant Kaleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert F. Baker, Jr. v. James S. Hill
as 5:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James S. Hill, Daniel Cuevas, City of Corona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Nesby v. Daniel Cuevas
as 2:2022cv00272
Petitioner:
James Nesby
Respondent:
Daniel Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JP Parnell v. D. Cueva
as 2:2020cv07422
Petitioner:
J P Parnell
Respondent:
D. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
