Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Jorge Farias v. U.S. Marshals
as 2:2017cv07030
Petitioner: Jorge Farias
Respondent: U.S. Marshals
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. L. Milusnic et al
as 2:2017cv01970
Defendant: Mr L. Milusnic, U.S. Marshal Los Angeles and Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff: Mikeal Glenn Stine
Howard Bloomgarden v. United States Marshal David M. Singer et al
as 2:2016cv06492
Plaintiff: Howard Bloomgarden
Defendant: Sheriff Jim McDonnell, Regional Director Mary M Mitchell and U.S. Marshal David M Singer
Frank Brett v. U.S. Marshall Bill et al
as 2:2016cv04028
Defendant: David Baker, Cape Regional Medical Center, David Graham and others
Plaintiff: Frank Brett
Yan Sui et al v. Richard A. Marshack et al
as 8:2015cv00059
Defendant: 2176 Pacific Homeowners Association, Catherine E Bauer, Jess R Bressi and others
Plaintiff: Yan Sui and Pei-Yu Yang
Vernett Ellis v. U.S. Bank NA et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Defendant: U.S. Bank NA, U.S. Marshals Service, McGlinchey Stafford LLP and others
Plaintiff: Vernett Ellis and (HC) Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlos Arroyo v. ESPN Sports Studio et al
as 2:2013cv09003
Plaintiff: Carlos Arroyo
Defendant: ESPN Sports Studio, Jessica Johnson, Steve Martinez and others
Douglas Mackenzie v. David M Singer et al
as 8:2012cv01162
Plaintiff: Douglas Mackenzie
Defendant: David M Singer and U.S. Marshal
Pertile v. John Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv06534
Defendant: Deputy U.S. Marshal Concepcion Arzate, Deputy U.S. Marshal Justin Davis and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Richard Ibarzabal v. U. S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv03503
Plaintiff: Richard Ibarzabal
Defendant: U. S. Department of Justice and U.S. Marshall Service Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?