Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Stephen Yagman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2013cv00354
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, Office of Information Policy and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Ronnie L Morgan v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2012cv01758
Petitioner:
Ronnie L Morgan
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Gwaine Collins v United States of Prisons
as 2:2011cv06153
Petitioner:
Gwaine Collins
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Odrey Paul Reed v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2011cv04405
Petitioner:
Odrey Paul Reed
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Ira Bloom v. Harley Lappin et al
as 2:2011cv04391
Plaintiff:
Ira Bloom
Defendant:
Leonard F Giron, Leonard F Giron , MD, Harley Lappin and others
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Bryant
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Robert E. MCFadden, Francisco J. Quintana and others
Robert Ree Smith v. The United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv03268
Petitioner:
Robert Ree Smith
Respondent:
The United States Bureau of Prisons and Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shahnam Davani v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv06015
Petitioner:
Shahnam Davani
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Linda Sanders and Charles Grigg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Randy Walker v. J L Norwood et al
as 5:2008cv00135
Petitioner:
Randy Walker
Respondent:
J L Norwood and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allan Steven Boren v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv00676
Plaintiff:
Allan Steven Boren and Allan Steven Boren
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Warren A Doucet, II and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
