Cases 21 - 30 of 11,240
David Abellard, Jr. et al v. Stretto, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
David Abellard, Jr. and Jessica Kerr
Defendant:
Stretto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kaminski v. Lipschutz
as 2:2024cv03905
Plaintiff:
David J. Kaminski
Defendant:
Michael Barry Lipschutz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
David Duk Kim v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03889
Plaintiff:
David Duk Son Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv00973
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zhang et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 8:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Liqiang Zhang
Petitioner:
MERRICK GARLAND
Defendant:
AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M. JADDOU and David Radel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
David Angel Sifuentes III v. Pluto TV
as 2:2024cv03901
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Pluto TV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
