Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Meredith Branham v. J. Villa et al
as 2:2020cv02090
Defendant:
J. Villa, A. Banks, Sergeant Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James Meredith Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contessa Branham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
Contessa Branham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Yvonne Branham v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv06816
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Branham
Brandy B. Branham v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Brandy B. Branham
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Jermaine Toomer vs. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 2:2014cv02780
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Leroy Baca, Jonathan Branham and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Toomer
Sherry Pate et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06321
Plaintiff:
Donna Adkins, Eva Ainesworth, Ruthie Algaier and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Anna Tanguay et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05937
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings Inc, American Medical Systems Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Arnold, Patricia Ann Babb-Farrow, Dolores Baker and others
Emmanuel L. Daniels v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitatin et al
as 2:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel L. Daniels
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitatin, W. D. Branham, Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Branham et al v. Pocklington et al
as 8:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Branham, Roger Branham, Roger Branham and others
Defendant:
Peter H Pocklington, Naoya Kinoshita, Daniel C Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
