Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sarah Frost v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv08438
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frost
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department and Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Daniel Rodriguez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2021cv01073
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez Uribe and Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
James Pham v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv01785
Defendant:
Jacob Wong, Daniel Rodriguez, Miguel Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
James Pham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Rodriguez v. Louis Milusnic
as 2:2013cv04148
Respondent:
Louis Milusnic
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Daniel Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv08622
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Deputy Thomas Maese and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Otilia Luna et al v. America's Wholesale Lender et al
as 2:2012cv00029
As Successor By Merger To BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Esa BAC Home Loans Servicing LP:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Doug Collop, Countrywide Home Loans Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Luna and Otilia Luna
Erroneously Sued As Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Erroneously Sued As US Bank National Association:
US Bank National Association
Daniel Rodriguez v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv09011
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Daniel Rodriguez v. Francisco J Quintana
as 2:2011cv00916
Respondent:
Francisco J Quintana
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
