Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kathleen Borland et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06923
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Borland, James Borland, Mark Ernstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv03027
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Petitioner:
Jeff Katofsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anthony Leocadio et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00797
Plaintiff:
Scotty Adams, Claud Aldridge, John Barone and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.
David Smith v. Turf Supper Club Inc et al
as 2:2016cv08833
Defendant:
Does, Jon Stamatopoulos and Turf Supper Club Inc
Plaintiff:
David Smith
David Smith v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 5:2015cv02513
Defendant:
A Deputy Known To Plaintiff as White Cloud, County of San Bernardino, Andrew Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Erika Jimenez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06615
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Home Box Office Inc, Floyd "Money&quo Mayweather and others
Plaintiff:
Erika Jimenez and David Smith
In Re:Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
as 2:2015ml02639
In Re:
Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden, John Assalian, Enrique Barrios and others
Petitioner:
Showtime Networks Inc., Attorney Edgardo Lopez, Mr. Maximino Lopez and others
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions LLC, EMMANUEL D. PACQUAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lumbsden A Sangster v. James Hall et al
as 5:2015cv00873
Defendant:
Jamie Adams, Danielle Boldt, Sean Daugherty and others
Plaintiff:
Lumbsden A Sangster
Troy David Smith v. M E Spearman
as 2:2013cv01948
Petitioner:
Troy David Smith
Respondent:
M E Spearman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
