Cases 1 - 10 of 52
(PC) Anderson v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Anderson
Defendant:
County of Shasta, Shasta County Sheriffs Office, Tom Bosenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Revoal v. Bakersfield Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
William Revoal
Defendant:
Bakersfield Medical Center, Corcoran State Prison and Kent Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Shasta County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv00877
Defendant:
Dave Kent, Van Gerwin, Shasta County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ashby v. Bosenko et al
as 1:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Aaron W. Ashby
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko, Tanner, Dave Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ashby v. Bosenko et al
as 2:2020cv00544
Plaintiff:
Aaron W. Ashby
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko, Tanner, Dave Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reinhardt v. Hamlin et al
as 1:2019cv00892
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Meehan, Arlan Harrell, Brad R. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Reinhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Burns v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2018cv03157
Plaintiff:
Dwayne B. Burns
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko, D. Kent, California Forensic Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Rosenberg et al
as 2:2018cv02969
Defendant:
Steven Eller, Steven C. Bailey, Nathan G. Leedy and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla and Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gibbs v. Webb et al
as 2:2018cv02817
Defendant:
Dave Kent, B. Rodgers, C. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Bonilla v. Harrell et al
as 1:2018cv01252
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Alvin L. Harrell and Kent Hamlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
