Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gant v. Rutherford et al
as 2:2015at00443
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
Rian Rutherford, Mary Speigle, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Gant v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Van der Boom et al v. Precision Medical Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
Gant Van der Boom , Darleen Roland and Jena Burns
Defendant:
Precision Medical Products, Inc., Jeremy Perkins and Marc Reynolds
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Maxey v. Gant
as 2:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
Jason Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gant v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv01364
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
M.D. McDonald, R. Pyer, P. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv00964
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
James Hartley, R. Osejo, M. Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Shasta County Department of Social Services
as 2:2010cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
Shasta County Department of Social Services Children & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero et al v. Zaragoza et al
as 1:2010cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edwin Marrero, Van A. Rose and John Nowlin
Defendant:
J. Zaragoza , D. Smith , Gant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gant v. Shasta County Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2009cv03549
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
Shasta County Department of Social Services, Jane Work, John Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
