Cases 11 - 20 of 22
v. Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture
as 1:2014at00605
Movant:
Michael Sweeney
Respondent:
Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv01189
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv01589
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv03053
Plaintiff:
Dexter Brown
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, California Department of Consumer Affairs, State Medical Board of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thao v. Donovan, et al.
as 1:2011cv00799
Plaintiff:
Toulu Thao
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan, Faye Austin, Marie Sudduth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Holtsinger v. Voros, et al
as 2:2003cv00732
Plaintiff:
Michael Holtsinger
Defendant:
Tonya Voros
Movant:
Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bess v. State of California, et al
as 2:2007cv01989
Plaintiff:
Sam Bess
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of the Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bess
as 2:2007at00872
Plaintiff:
Sam Bess
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of the Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
