Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Shields v. Foston et al
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Remon Shields
Defendant:
D. Foston, P. Miller, James Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Woodmansee et al
as 2:2009cv03130
Plaintiff:
Susan Shaw
Defendant:
C W Woodmansee and J E Woodmansee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shaw v. Woodmansee et al
as 2:2009at01804
Plaintiff:
Susan Shaw
Defendant:
C W Woodmansee and J E Woodmansee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Beiruti v. Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers et al
as 1:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers, Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers, Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vargas v. Sugrue
as 1:2009cv00842
Petitioner:
Rogelio Galicia Vargas
Respondent:
J. E. Sugrue, J. E. Sugrue and J. E. Sugrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armentero v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01716
Plaintiff:
Luis Lorenzo Armentero
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, J. Ingrao, J Murray Fries and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrell v. CA Highway Patrol, et al
as 2:2007cv01514
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Harrell
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Roberts, Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Salazar v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Luis Vargas Salazar
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D. K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
