Cases 11 - 20 of 23
SEC v. McKinley Mortgage Co. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00616
Defendant:
McKinley Mortgage Company, LLC, Laura A. Sanford, Charles G. Preston and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Not Classified By Court:
Krista L. Freitag
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
E K Wade
Defendant:
Jeff Miller, Gary Ackerman, Sandy Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newhouse et al v. Aurora Bank FSB
as 2:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Michelle Newhouse , Richard Newhouse , Darlene Alcala and others
Defendant:
Aurora Bank FSB , Aurora Loan Services, LLC, a limited liability corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanford v. Hagwood et al
as 2:2011cv03480
Plaintiff:
Charles Sanford
Defendant:
Greg Hagwood, Jail Commander and Debora Gonsalves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ
as 1:2011at00143
Plaintiff:
PAUL JARRETT LOPEZ
Defendant:
F. BANUELOS and S. SANFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Banuelos, et al.
as 1:2011cv00466
Plaintiff:
Paul Jarrett Lopez
Defendant:
F. Banuelos and S. Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pobursky v. Papagni
as 1:2010cv00326
Petitioner:
James Sanford Pobursky
Respondent:
Douglas Papagni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Janis, et al v. USA
as 1:2004cv05812
Plaintiff:
Gust Marion Janis
Defendant:
USA , Greggs, Robert Haro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gables v. State of California EDD et al
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Theodore Gables
Defendant:
State of California EDD, Brenda Bunnell, Carol Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Shafer et al
as 1:2007cv01498
Plaintiff:
Sanford D. Jones
Defendant:
Dee Shafer, Ph.D, Michael Themins and Tim Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
