Cases 21 - 30 of 4,738
(PC) Bonilla v. England
as 2:2024cv02211
Defendant:
Morrison C. England, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Holmes v. Cardoza et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Dominique Holmes
Defendant:
C. Lassell, Prado, K. Bettencourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Madi v. Acting Warden of USP Atwater et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Respondent:
Acting Warden of USP Atwater and C. Peters
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Madi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Davis v. Tyler et al
as 2:2024cv02166
Defendant:
R. Mitchell, M. Hintz, T. Tyler and others
Plaintiff:
Emmett Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Taylor v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Defendant:
Moreno, B. Yang, C/O J. Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Dydise Demuhl Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Defendant:
O. Bailey, Roland Servantes, Dr. Frempong and others
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Goncalves v. Austin III et al
as 2:2024cv01985
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Lloyd J. Austin III, Jody J. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Goncalves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Jones v. Castillo et al
as 1:2024cv00831
Defendant:
Razo, Castillo, Pelago and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chatman v. Duran et al
as 2:2024cv01929
Defendant:
H. Ortiz Zamora, J. Davis, B. Patillo and others
Plaintiff:
Audree Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.C., et al., v. City of Vallejo
as 2:2024at00861
Plaintiff:
M. G. and J. C.
Defendant:
City of Vallejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
