Cases 21 - 30 of 30
(HC) Felder v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv00895
Petitioner:
Freeman Allan Felder
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Myers v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Anthony James Myers
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips and Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Berry v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Roland Alfred Berry
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Morse v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
Gerald Wayne Morse
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Phillips, et. al.
as 2:2011cv02805
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Crawford
Defendant:
John D. Phillips, Zoette L. Dobbert, Connie M Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagra v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02250
Plaintiff:
Jagdev Nagra, Jasbir Nagra and All Pallets Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank Paco Lopez, Guadalupe Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Phillips v. The United States Government
as 2:2009cv01535
Plaintiff:
O D Phillips
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Miller v. City of Sacramento et al
as 1:2007cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miller
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Paul Schindler, V Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. City of Sacramento et al
as 1:2007at00196
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miller
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Paul Schindler, V Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2007cv00765
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miller
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Paul Schindler, V Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
