Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Doe v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez, Michael Pallares, Favre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2022at00961
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Officer Greg Rodriguez, Acting Warden Michael Pallares, Officer Favre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Northern California Fertility Medical Center
as 2:2022at01054
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Northern California Fertility Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Doe v. Northern CA Fertility Medical Center
as 2:2022cv01861
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Northern California Fertility Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barker v. Goat et al
as 2:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
William Barker
Defendant:
Goat, Jane Does 1-5, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
