Cases 21 - 30 of 195
Doe v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022at00129
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022at00128
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dunn v. Austin et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dunn
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Gregory M. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Dunn v. austin et al
as 2:2022at00165
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dunn
Defendant:
Lloyd austin, Frank Kendall, Gregory M. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christensen, et al v. Liberty Utilities
as 2:2021cv02258
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Christensen, Shad Lafonties, Michael Scott Avis and others
Defendant:
Liberty Utilities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christensen et al v. Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC
as 2:2021at01159
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Christensen, Shad Lafonties, Michael Scott Avis and others
Defendant:
Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tejada-Otero v. City of Tracy
as 2:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero and Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II
Defendant:
City of Tracy, Fabiola Hernandez and Yordan Coss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00948
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Danevia Rhone, Leslie Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
