Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Stansbury v. United States Government et al
as 1:2009cv01043
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Government, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phillips v. The United States Government
as 2:2009cv01535
Plaintiff:
O D Phillips
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Kareem Stansbury v. United States Government et al
as 1:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Government, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. United States Government
as 2:2008at00444
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones et al v. United States Government
as 2:2008cv00893
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones and Jill Jones
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Smith v. The United States Government et al
as 1:2007cv01431
Petitioner:
James E. Smith
Respondent:
The United States Government and Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn et al v. United States Government (FBI) et al
as 2:2007at00507
Plaintiff:
Zakiya Vaughn, Jamonte Vaughn, Jamarco Vaughn and others
Defendant:
United States Government (FBI), Sacramento County Sheriff, Sacramento City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Vaughn, et al v. USA (FBI), et al
as 2:2007cv01119
Plaintiff:
Zakiya Vaughn, Jamonte Vaughn, Jamarco Vaughn and others
Defendant:
United States Government (FBI), Sacramento County Sheriff, Sacramento City Police and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
