Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Fields et al v. County Sacramento et al
as 2:2012at01518
Plaintiff:
Melosha Fields , Melvina Fields , Melvin Fields and others
Defendant:
County Sacramento, speirs, meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. County Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv02862
Plaintiff:
Melosha Fields , Melvina Fields , Melvin Fields and others
Defendant:
County Sacramento, Verne L. Speirs, - Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Capretto v. Bank of America N.A et al
as 2:2012cv02012
Plaintiff:
Roberto O. Capretto, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Law Offices of Blank Rome, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maciel v. Knipp
as 2:2012cv01023
Petitioner:
Daniel Seth Maciel
Respondent:
William Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011at00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crosby v. County of Mono et al
as 2:2011cv01458
Plaintiff:
William R. Crosby
Defendant:
County of Mono, Town of Mamoth Lakes , Monet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Tilakamonkul
as 1:2010cv01705
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Vichit Seth Tilakamonkul
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Strong v. Tolman et al
as 2:2009cv00815
Plaintiff:
Vance Strong
Defendant:
M A Tolman, Seth R Holt, Mike Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zochlinski v. Regents of the University of California et al
as 2:2009at00105
Plaintiff:
Howard Alan Zochlinski
Defendant:
Regents of the University of California, City of Davis, County of Yolo and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
