Cases 41 - 50 of 891
Adams, Jr. v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023at00015
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Lewis and County of Stanislaus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Leeann Kay Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(PC) Reeves v. Diesslin et al
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Reeves
Defendant:
Diesslin, Lewis and Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Lewis et al v. Blakoslee et al
as 2:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
Alijhandra Lewis and Shicoya Manning
Defendant:
Nathan Blakoslee, James Manor, Nicholas Frayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Parks
as 1:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Brian Dion Lewis
Defendant:
S Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Newsome et al
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Daronta Tyrone Lewis
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deputy Director of CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lewis v. The People of the State of CA
as 2:2022cv01307
Petitioner:
Joel Ladon Lewis
Respondent:
The People of the State of California Superior Court for the County of San Joaquin and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(UD)(PS) Hartono v. Lewis
as 2:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Agus Hartono
Defendant:
Yolanda Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
