Cases 51 - 60 of 3,877
(PC) Coley v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Andrew Calvin Coley
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva and H. Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02991
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Haggerty v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv02943
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Haggerty
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Harris v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
B. D. Phillips, L. Delafuente, E. Espalin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv02899
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Macomber, C. Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PS) Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02843
Defendant:
Alling & Jillson, LTD, El Dorado County Superior Court, David L. DeVore and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Knox Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(HC) Carrillo-Carrillo v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01690
Petitioner:
Samuel E. Carrillo-Carrillo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Davenport v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
James Bobby Davenport, III
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, Daran, Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
