Cases 61 - 70 of 285
Holguin v. Thackery et al
as 1:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
Felipe Roman Holguin
Defendant:
DA Thackery and DA Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GreenGate Fresh, LLLP, v. Trinity Fresh Procurement, LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv03161
Defendant:
Trinity Fresh Procurement, LLC, Trinity Fresh Management, LLC, Paul Abess and others
Plaintiff:
GreenGate Fresh, LLLP
Intervenor Plaintiff:
1st Quality Produce, Inc., Coastal Pacific Sales, LLC, Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
(PC) Germain v. Janam ,et al.
as 1:2018cv01597
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Mercado, B. Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Germain v. Janam ,et al.
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Mercado, B. Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2018cv02836
Defendant:
Jeremiah Skaggs, Melissa White, City of Stockton and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2018at01627
Defendant:
Jeremiah Skaggs, Melissa White, City of Stockton and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Peden v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv02681
Defendant:
H.O.P.E. Theraputic Services, Marcia Rogers, Diana Sabaria and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elvis Peden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
(PC) Bonilla v. Peterson et al
as 2:2018cv02255
Defendant:
Jeremy Peterson and J. Hellings
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thornberry v. Baughman, et al.
as 2:2018cv02124
Defendant:
Stephan Riley, David Baughman and John Peterson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Thornberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thornberry v. Baughman, et al.
as 1:2018cv01019
Defendant:
Stephan Riley, David Baughman and John Peterson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Thornberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.