Cases 71 - 80 of 278
Redela v. Amy's Comfort Care Inc. et al
as 1:2019at00439
Defendant:
Amardeep Kaur, Amy's Comfort Care Inc. and Amardeep Dhillon
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Redela
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aranda et al v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2019cv00613
Defendant:
Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, United States Bureau Of Indian Affairs, Tory Burdick and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lisa Fontinalla and Marie Diane Aranda
Intervenor Defendant:
Michael Mendibles, Antoinette Lopez, California Valley Miwok Tribe Tribal Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Aranda et al v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2019at00268
Defendant:
Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, Carol Rogers Davis, Amy Dutschke and others
Plaintiff:
Marie D Aranda and Yolanda Lisa Fontinalla
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
(SS) Kehler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sarah Amy Farah Kehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kehler v. Berryhill
as 1:2019at00131
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sarah Amy Farah Kehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(PC) Bodnar v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2018cv02702
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Jeremy Coles, Domingo Aguilar, James Rokop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2018cv01313
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Garcia and Amy Ellen Garcia
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
(PC) Moss v. Bowermen, et al.
as 1:2018cv01191
Defendant:
Gayona, Gonzalo Gill Maravilla, Darrell Mount and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2018at00705
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Garcia and Amy Ellen Garcia
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
