Cases 1 - 10 of 180
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Umberger et al v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
George P. Umberger, II, Lisabeth A. King and Savannah R. Bailey
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) McEwen v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Darel McEwen
Defendant:
Michael Driscoll, Johnathan Reed, Carly Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bailey v. Mejia et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bailey
Defendant:
R. Mejia, J. Martinez, D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bailey v. CCWF Warden
as 1:2023cv01588
Petitioner:
Malika Bailey
Respondent:
CCWF Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Shasta Union High School District, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Maril Bailey
Defendant:
Shasta Union High School District, Lauren Stroud, Steve Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(HC) Bailey v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv01228
Petitioner:
Johnel M. Bailey
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bailey v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01087
Petitioner:
Brent Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Bailey v. Madden
as 1:2022cv01273
Petitioner:
Demetris Frank Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
