Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
(SS) Acevedo Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00657
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Baldemar Acevedo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Bravo Acevedo v. Herbst et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Maria Consuelo Bravo Acevedo
Defendant:
Gary Herbst, Brian Poochigian, Terry A. Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Snow v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Snow
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Jennifer P. Shaffer, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nguyen v. Acevedo
as 2:2023cv01086
Petitioner:
Dai Nguyen
Respondent:
Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS)Acevedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ernest Gill Acevedo, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Acevedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00327
Plaintiff:
Ernest Gill Acevedo, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(PC) Arreguin v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
Mario Rene Arreguin
Defendant:
A. Jimenez, L. Jimenez, J. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) King v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Larry Louis King
Defendant:
K. Clark, M. A. Mason, J. Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
