Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Candler v. Caro
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven R.G. Candler
Defendant:
Abram Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.D.D., et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
D.D.D. and Alexia Caro
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Nice-Pak Productions, Inc. and Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
D.D.D., et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023at01010
Plaintiff:
Damico D. Decker and Alexia Caro
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Nice-Pak Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martinez v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Adan Martinez
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Eric Toomey and Nicholas Caro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARO v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2019at00161
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
CESAR ADOLFO CARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Caro v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00373
Petitioner:
Cesar Adolfo Caro
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and M. Eliot Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beteta v. Cate et al
as 1:2013cv00746
Plaintiff:
Jose N. Beteta
Defendant:
Matthew Cate and Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez-Salazar v. Marks et al
as 2:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Luciano Ramirez-Salazar
Defendant:
Caro Marks, Richard Cohen, Timothy L. Zindel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz-Caro v. USA (2255 07-CR-0450 GEB)
as 2:2012cv00211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Enrique Ruiz-Caro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Woodward v. Subia et al
as 2:2007cv00498
Plaintiff:
Johnie M. Woodward
Defendant:
Rick Subia, Rosanne Campbell, R. J. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
