Cases 1 - 10 of 300
(PC) Duncan v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Defendant:
I. Sanchez, E. Cantu, J. Robles-Ayala and others
Plaintiff:
Ceasar Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cone v. Gamble III, et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Defendant:
California Dept Corrections, J - Garza, Zaragoza and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Monroe Cone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Osuna v. Burnes et al
as 2:2024cv01820
Defendant:
J. Fugate, S. Gonzalez, W. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Osuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Spectrum Brands Pet LLC
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christine Garza
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands Pet LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
(HC)Garza v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv01723
Petitioner:
Angel M. Garza
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Bryan Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Pond et al
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Robin A. Jones
Defendant:
Rachel Pond, Pamela Ombudsperson, Mary Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Garza v. Dof et al
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Garza
Defendant:
Hector Dof and Reginal Orageoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ayers-Garza v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Brad Ayers-Garza
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
