Cases 1 - 10 of 33
(PC) Keen v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keen
Defendant:
Cross and S. Wailace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keene v. Wesco International, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2023cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gerald Keene
Defendant:
Wesco International Inc., Anixter Inc., Anixter International LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Keene v. WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 1:2023at00988
Plaintiff:
Gerald Keene
Defendant:
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC., ANIXTER INC., ANIXTER INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PS) Gigena v. Sexton et al
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Andrea Sexton, Patrick M. Keene, John Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Salas-Keen v. The Jackson Laboratory
as 2:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Heather Salas-Keen
Defendant:
The Jackson Laboratory Doing business as The Jackson Laboratory, West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
(PC) Fowers v. Artley
as 2:2020cv00947
Defendant:
Paul Artley, Sacramento FBI, Sacramento PD and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keene Fowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Keen v. Lynch
as 2:2020cv00589
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Zelaya v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Phillips v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ebel v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir R. Ebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
