Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PC) Miller v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01981
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal Miller
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Amy Nelson and Antonina Filenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2017cv01510
Plaintiff:
Darron Daniels, Travis Washington, Jr., Omar Samuels and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, Parole Board Hearing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv01589
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv01189
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael A. Miller v. Biter
as 1:2012cv00467
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Miller
Respondent:
M.D. Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown , A. Schwarzenegger and Z. Morazzini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission v. Infusion Media Inc
as 2:2009mc00059
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Infusion Media Inc, West Coast Internet Media, Inc, Two warnings, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robert G. Wing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Miller v. State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01117
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Miller
Respondent:
State of California and James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. County of Calaveras et al.
as 1:2008cv01705
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Rhodes
Defendant:
County of Calaveras, Dave Sanders, Thomas Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
