Cases 1 - 10 of 137
(PC) Meneese v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jamar Meneese
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Ralph Diaz, K. Michels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Garner v. Hill, et al.,
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Marcus Andre Garner
Defendant:
Rick Hill and Folsom State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Garner v. Hill
as 2:2023at00256
Plaintiff:
Marcus Andre Garner
Defendant:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Perry v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv02140
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Perry
Defendant:
M. Nelson, S. Banke, M. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nunn v. Hill
as 2:2022cv01396
Petitioner:
Joseph Arthur Nunn
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v State of California, et al
as 2:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ross
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Folsom State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Moore v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sidni Alfred Moore
Defendant:
Rick Hill, L. Johnson, W. Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Ross et al
as 2:2022at00465
Defendant:
Cynthia Ross, State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(HC) Wade v. Hill
as 2:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
Chancellor Wade
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Davis v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Clifton Davis
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Brown, R. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.