Cases 1 - 10 of 18
In the Matter of Charles Thomas Marshall State Bar #176091
as 3:2023mc80100
Respondent:
Charles Thomas Marshall
Coxon v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Coxon
Defendant:
United States District Court, United States Attorneys, United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Coxon v. United States District Court et al
as 4:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Coxon
Defendant:
United States District Court, United States Attorneys, United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
as 3:2020mc80143
In Re:
DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marshall Daniels
v. In Re DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
as 5:2020cv05432
Not Classified By Court:
YouTube, LLC
Petitioner:
Marshall Daniels
In Re:
In Re DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
Marshall v. Motel 6 Operating LP
as 4:2019cv03095
Plaintiff:
Glenn Marshall
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP and Motel 6 Operating LP (G6 Hospitality LLC erroneously sued as Motel 6 Operating LP) doing business as Motel 6
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In the Matter of Charles Thomas Marshall - #176091
as 3:2015mc80300
Respondent:
Charles Thomas Marshall
Marshall et al v. Monster Beverage Corporation
as 3:2014cv02203
Plaintiff:
Osie Marshall , Yasna Cuevas and John Van Es
Defendant:
Monster Beverage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Republic of the Marshall Islands v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01885
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Charles Hagel, Ernest Moniz and others
Plaintiff:
The Republic of the Marshall Islands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Schneider v. Bishop, Whtie, Marshall & Weibel, P.S.
as 3:2012cv06369
Defendant:
Bishop, Whtie, Marshall & Weibel, P.S.
Plaintiff:
Steven Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
