Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Walton v. Gausewitz et al
as 4:2008cv02590
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
William Gausewitz, James E. Tilton, James D. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders v. Tilton
as 3:2008cv02485
Petitioner:
Ricky Renee Sanders
Respondent:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez v. Walker et al
as 3:2008cv02389
Petitioner:
Armando R. Gonzalez
Respondent:
James Walker and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Concepcion v. Tilton et al
as 4:2008cv02296
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Concepcion
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, Scott Kernan, Rick Rimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balbo v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv00159
Petitioner:
John Michael Balbo
Defendant:
James E. Tilton and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florez v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Armand Florez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florez v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2007cv05763
Plaintiff:
Armand Florez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon v. Yates et al
as 3:2007cv05719
Petitioner:
David Michael Leon
Respondent:
James A. Yates and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carmichael v. Hickman et al
as 4:2007cv05622
Plaintiff:
Raynell Carmichael
Defendant:
Roderick Hickman, James E. Tilton, Richard W. Sandhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peng v. Tilton et al
as 3:2007cv04797
Petitioner:
Kun S. Peng
Respondent:
James E. Tilton and Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
