Cases 81 - 90 of 490
Chavez v. Curry
as 3:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Gertrudes Chavez
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dowdy v. Curry
as 3:2009cv03144
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Dowdy
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. Curry
as 3:2009cv03090
Petitioner:
Randolph Gibbs
Respondent:
B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lang v. Curry
as 3:2009cv03020
Petitioner:
Laurence Duane Lang
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02946
Plaintiff:
Paul Charles Currie
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and California Men's Colony - East/West Facility(s)/Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02932
Plaintiff:
Paul Charles Currie
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and California Men's Colony - East/West Facility(s)/Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 3:2009cv02791
Plaintiff:
Jefferson D. Walker
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings and Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez v. Curry
as 5:2009cv02714
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Vasquez
Respondent:
B. Curry and Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Curry
as 3:2009cv02714
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Vasquez
Respondent:
B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piltz v. Curry
as 4:2009cv02716
Petitioner:
Leslie Piltz
Respondent:
B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
