Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant: Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
United States of America et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2018cv06506
Plaintiff: State of Mississippi and United States of America
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shannon v. USPS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00004
Plaintiff: Bruce Shannon
Defendant: USPS, Methodist Hospital and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?