Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
State of California et al v. Trump et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00872
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Steven T. Mnuchin, United States of America and others
Petitioner: Southern Border Communities Coalition and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al -v- Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00941
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc. , Gilead Sciences Limited (GSL), Gilead Sciences ULC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States Of America et al v. Genentech, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00822
Plaintiff: United States Of America , State of California , Colorado and others
Defendant: Genentech, Inc., OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State of Missouri et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03619
Plaintiff: State of Missouri , State of Arkansas , State of Michigan and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?