Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Goree v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07859
Plaintiff:
Lane Goree
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falls et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv05387
Plaintiff:
Alfred G. Falls, Amancio de Jesus Diaz Solis, Barbara Paul and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv07312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04728
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. America
as 4:2020cv06769
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp. America
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In Re Nathaniel B. Sobayo
as 5:2020mc80145
Appellee:
Daniel Butt, Hong Jacqueline Gardner, Robert K Lane and others
Appellant:
Nathaniel Basolo Sobayo
Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Vivotek USA Inc.
as 5:2020cv03416
Defendant:
Vivotek USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lane v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04661
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., JAMES MONSEES, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Eyeris Entertainment
as 4:2020cv02369
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Eyeris Entertainment and Eyeris Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
