Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Malberg v. Nagle et al
as 5:2022cv05027
Plaintiff:
Martin Malberg
Defendant:
Sharon Nagle, Jeffrey R. Vincent, Kymberly E. Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Malberg v. McCracken et al
as 5:2022cv03928
Plaintiff:
Martin Malberg
Defendant:
Judge Joanne McCracken, Judge Christine Garcia-Sen, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malberg v. McCracken et al
as 5:2022cv03613
Plaintiff:
Martin Malberg
Defendant:
Judge Joanne McCracken, Judge Christine Garcia-Sen, Attorney General Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cecil v. Bustilos et al
as 5:2022cv03523
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Cecil
Defendant:
Mark Bustilos and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Bonta
as 4:2022cv03487
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hazzard v. Schaaf et al
as 4:2022cv02921
Plaintiff:
Gene Hazzard
Defendant:
Mayor Libby Schaaf, City Of Oakland, Mialisa Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warner v. St. Andre
as 3:2022cv02916
Petitioner:
Ryan Scott Warner
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parsons v. Calipatria Stae Prison et al
as 3:2022cv01943
Petitioner:
Jason Parsons
Respondent:
Calipatria Stae Prison, Warren L. Montgomery and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Bonta, et al.
as 4:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
Burl Evans
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Cecily Gray, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malberg v. McCracken et al
as 5:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Martin Malberg
Defendant:
Judge Joanne McCracken, Judge Christine Garcia-Sen, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
