Cases 31 - 40 of 495
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sot v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv03976
Plaintiff:
Tom Toeum Sot
Defendant:
Kildo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Mackie v. West Valley Properties, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02663
Plaintiff:
Tom Edward Mackie
Defendant:
West Valley Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Dhingra v. Esposito et al
as 3:2022cv02207
Defendant:
Eliina Stephenson, Charles Esposito, Eliina N. Belenkiy and others
Plaintiff:
Rakesh Dhingra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gutzalenko et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gutzalenko, Honey Gutzalenko, N.G. and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Bisa French, Tom Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
UnifySCC et al v. Cody et al
as 5:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
UnifySCC, Tom Davis and Maria Ramirez
Defendant:
Sara H. Cody, James Williams, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McEnery v. McEnery et al
as 4:2021cv09614
Plaintiff:
John P. McEnery, IV
Defendant:
Tom McEnery, Martin Menne and MCM Diversified
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lopes v. Pelosi et al
as 3:2021cv09379
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lopes
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Xavier Becerra, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wood et al v. SGT Investments et al
as 3:2021cv08784
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood and T. P.
Defendant:
SGT Investments, FCI Investments, Tom Malgesini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
