Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Naufahu et al v. City of San Mateo
as 3:2007cv05189
Plaintiff:
Tevita L. Naufahu, Kasitalea Gus Naufahu, Luisa A.P. Naufahu and others
Defendant:
City of San Mateo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Phoenix American Incorporated v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England
as 3:2007cv00741
Plaintiff:
Phoenix American Incorporated and Phoenix American Incorporated
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England and others
Cross-claimant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England
Cross-defendant:
Gus Constatin, Gus Constatin, Lease Management Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cintas Corporation v. Aranegui et al
as 3:2006cv05126
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Gus Aranegui, Stephen Gaskins, Ralph Guys, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as M:2006cv01781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type:
Labor
In re: Cintas Corp. Overtime Pay Arbitration Litigation
as 3:2006md01781
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Robert J. Abel, David J. Abrahamsen, Nicholas Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AB&I v. Goa Mi Gus Malleable Iron Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2002cv03151
Plaintiff:
AB&I
Defendant:
Qiaoshan Casting Company Ltd., Goa Mi Gus Malleable Iron Company Ltd., Hua Wong Centrifugaly Spun Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
