Cases 51 - 60 of 673
A.C. v. City of Pleasanton et al
as 3:2022cv05330
Plaintiff:
A.C.
Defendant:
City of Pleasanton, Anthony Repetto, Brian Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Levchin et al
as 3:2022cv05300
Plaintiff:
Ron Williams
Defendant:
Max Levchin, Michael Linford, Jeremy Liew and others
Norman v. The White House et al
as 3:2022cv05154
Plaintiff:
Garred F. Norman
Defendant:
The White House, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh et al
as 3:2022cv04958
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburgh, Shanelle Preston, Jelani Killings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manalisay v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
James Manalisay
Defendant:
Boydine Hall, Adam Byer, Toni Mims-Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. City of Sausalito et al
as 3:2022cv04671
Plaintiff:
Robyn Kelly
Defendant:
City of Sausalito, Chris Zapata, Janelle Kellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Hiles et al
as 4:2022cv04643
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bryant
Defendant:
Heather Hiles, Stacy Brown-Philpot, Sherman Whites and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
White v. U.S. Center for SafeSport
as 3:2022cv04468
Petitioner:
Charles White
Respondent:
U.S. Center for SafeSport
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
