Cases 1 - 10 of 80
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/24
as 3:2024mc80145
Unknown:
Krishna Kumar Yerur, Ferdinand Carbonell Malimban, Teodoro Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund; and Its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Meza
as 3:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund; and Its Joint Board of Trustees, Robert Williams, John Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Otoniel Meza doing business as Tony's Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Branch v. American First Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv04311
Petitioner:
Maengra Branch, MARTHA ALCALA, JOSE ARELLANO and others
Respondent:
American First Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Meza v. St. Andre
as 5:2023cv03912
Petitioner:
Joaquin Meza
Respondent:
R. St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Su v. Meza et al
as 3:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
John Michael Meza, Jessica Leyva Meza, Michael Ayesh and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MEZA v. Coty, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05291
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE MEZA and Chelsea Garland
Defendant:
Coty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
