Cases 1 - 10 of 153
DeWitt v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv05261
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. DeWitt
Defendant:
Paul Ryan, California Citizens Redistricting Commission, Alex Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. State of California et al
as 5:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
Steve Y. Garrison
Defendant:
State of California, San Quentin State Prison, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Schwarzenegger
as 3:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Dan H. Sterling
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Rudy Vega
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kim Kumar and Edward M. Birdsong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Linda C. Lingle, for the Interstate Corrections Compact and other Corrections Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Locke, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Grounds et al
as 3:2011cv04997
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Walker
Respondent:
Randy Grounds, Board of Parole Hearings and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2011cv04523
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Ornelas, L. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nakashima v. Curry et al
as 3:2011cv04463
Petitioner:
Roy H. Nakashima
Respondent:
Ben Curry, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peoples v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2011cv01196
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples, Jr.
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cates, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
