Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Walton et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv04843
Plaintiff:
Denisha Walton, Justin Walton and Denisha M Walton
Defendant:
Kee Ana Smith, Wendy Lee Lowinger, Monica Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. EDD-UI, Los Angeles et al
as 4:2022cv07862
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Wood
Defendant:
EDD-UI, Los Angeles and EDD-UI, Claims Department/ Sacramento California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Hayden et al
as 4:2022cv07284
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Wood
Defendant:
Jeffrey Hayden, Neal Taniguchi, Peter Ring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clement Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04785
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Defendant:
Clement Holdings, LLC, FCI Lender Services, Inc., SGT Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Woods v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Earnest C. Woods
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Woods v. Davis
as 4:2020cv01444
Petitioner:
Earnest C. Woods
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2019cv07124
Defendant:
Thomas Maddock, Mary P. Carey, Cecelia Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2019cv04266
Defendant:
Thomas Maddock, Mary P. Carey, Lois Haight and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv04247
Defendant:
Edyth Williams and County of Contra Costa
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Chidi et al
as 3:2019cv04202
Defendant:
Acacia Chidi, Edyth Williams and County of Contra Costa
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood and Andrea Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
