Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2023cv02996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Washington v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Anthony Washington
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, State of California, CCPOA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quair v. CDCR - HQ et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv06888
Defendant:
CCPOA - HQ, United States Post Office, CDCR - HQ and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Churchill v. California Department of Corrections Board of Prison Terms et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv03711
Plaintiff:
David Harlow Churchill
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections Board of Prison Terms and State Parole CCPOA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2011cv01914
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Roark, II
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deuel Vocational Institution, Jerry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hines v. CCPOA
as 4:2009cv03369
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
CCPOA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.