Cases 1 - 10 of 373
Rutman et al v. Bayer Cropscience, LLC
as 3:2024cv06751
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, LLC, Monsanto and JOHN DOES 1-50
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Rutman and Robert Rutman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jambulingham v. Defendant 1 et al
as 3:2024cv05792
Defendant:
Defendant 2, AMEAD, Defendant 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Hemanthkumar Jambulingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe 1 et al v. Fenix International Limited et al
as 3:2024cv03713
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Fenix International Limited and Fenix Internet LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Defendant:
Ian Albert, Lt. Rold, City and County of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
