Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ko v. Thurman
as 4:2022cv09087
Plaintiff:
Lily Helen Ko
Defendant:
Christine Angela Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2019cv02690
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Brian Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Matias Malig, as Trustee for the Malig Family Trust
Petitioner:
Harold Tholen, Deep Dinesh Patel, Rakesh Khanna and others
Interested Party:
Frederic Lande, Palm Bay Police & Firefighters' Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ko v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2022cv07647
Plaintiff:
Anna Ko
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
IN RE LYFT, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 4:2020cv09257
Defendant:
Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter, Hiroshi Mikitani, Logan Green and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Chenoy, Yao Hong Kok and Vishal Mehta
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Brad Shuman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Holt et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv05795
Plaintiff:
Alvin Holt, Paula Sinclair and Ben Kos
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
