Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Casun Invest A.G. v. NVWS Properties LLC
as 5:2023mc80032
Plaintiff:
Casun Invest A.G.
Defendant:
NVWS Properties LLC, Michael H. Ponder and Lezlie Gunn
Petitioner:
Ronald Simpson
Interested Party:
Christine Drage, Joseph Ira Burkemper and Weil & Drage, APC
Bermudez v. Allison et al
as 3:2020cv00860
Defendant:
C/O Bailey, R. Burgh, J. Allison and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv03207
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ponder and Thomas J Ponder
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 3:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Begley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessel et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03814
Plaintiff:
Eddie Kessel , Asa Tucker , Shelby Warhurst and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv06287
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Martin
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Gregory Lewis, Anthony Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 4:2012cv02480
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Locke, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Beam et al
as 3:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
Beam, Rendon, E. Denise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
