Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fc Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Benedict v. Sterling Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Adrian Benedict
Defendant:
Sterling Inc. doing business as Kay Jewelers and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thongstisubskul v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv01306
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
Adrian Thongstisubskul
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Miller et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2019cv01537
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Martin Horan, Brent Orick and others
Plaintiff:
San Diego County Gun Owners Political Action Committee, Patrick Russ, Ryan Peterson and others
Amicus Curiae:
Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Chavez v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01336
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez
Defendant:
Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss
Chavez v. DeVille Asset Management, LTD.
as 3:2018cv02163
Defendant:
DeVille Asset Management, LTD.
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chavez v. Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez
Defendant:
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chavez v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
