Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00553
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barfield v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Robert Barfield
Defendant:
Sheriff Doe, Deputy Sheriff Doe 1-50, All Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yablonsky v. Alford et al
as 3:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
Alford, Mondet, Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. County of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
William Howard Ward
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Undersheriff and Acting Sheriff Kelly Martinez,, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Doe 1-50 and John and/or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Diakite v. Poladian et al
as 3:2019cv01341
Defendant:
R. Longworth, M. Poladian and Doe 1-50
Plaintiff:
Amadou Diakite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. Tarsadia Hotels et al
as 3:2018cv02290
Defendant:
Gregory Casserly, Tarsadia Hotels, Tushar Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rademaker v. Juarez et al
as 3:2018cv01831
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, R. Walker, B. Self and others
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moody et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv01110
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. Moody , Gary T. Deans , Billy R. Williams and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Daniel Paramo, McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
