Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Johnson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Herbert Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Seeley, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, M. Glynn, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. v. Regal Beloit America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02544
Plaintiff:
Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Regal Beloit America, Inc. and Regal Beloit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Poolman Products, Inc. v. Custom Molded Products, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02174
Plaintiff:
Poolman Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Custom Molded Products, LLC, Pool Water Products, Inc., Alpha West Marketing Group, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Poole v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02093
Plaintiff:
James Poole
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calderon et al v. Total Wealth Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01632
Plaintiff:
Albert Calderon, Laurence Gleason, Inga Gleason and others
Defendant:
Total Wealth Management, Inc., Jacob Cooper, Jed Cooper and others
Receiver:
Kristen A. Janulewicz and Thomas A. Seaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sult v. Paramo et al
as 3:2015cv01016
Petitioner:
James Sult
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo , Kamala D. Harris , J.D. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poole v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2014cv03044
Petitioner:
Juan L. Poole, II
Respondent:
Bonnie M. Dumanis and William Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2014cv02654
Plaintiff:
Andrew Poole
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
