Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reayes v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kejuan D. Reayes
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Scott Steadman, Jason Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider et al v. Helix Water District et al
as 3:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Mark Schneider, Julie Schneider and Makani Schneider
Defendant:
Helix Water District, Carlos Lugo, Kevin Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Lugo v. USA
as 3:2021cv01211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Noe Rene Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoskins v. Haro et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raye Hoskins, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Varela, V. Haro and Lugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lugo v. Fisher et al
as 3:2018cv02878
Respondent:
R. Fisher and Office of the Attorney General
Petitioner:
Keith Robert Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lugo-Navarrete v. USA
as 3:2016cv02707
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maria Del Refugio Lugo-Navarrete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
3 Ratones Ciegos, LLC v. Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 1 LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02035
Plaintiff:
3 Ratones Ciegos, LLC
Defendant:
Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 1 LLC, Mucha Lucha Libre Taco Shop 3 LLC, Santos Lucha Libre Taco Shop 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Rodriguez-Lugo v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv02174
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio Rodriguez-Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Lugo v. Valverde et al
as 3:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Manuel David Lugo
Defendant:
George Valverde and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
